Sicko

I finally watched Michael Moore's documentary Sicko last night. Although it would be wise to recognize the one-sided nature of Moore's depiction of the health care crisis in America, it is hard to argue with him on many of the issues raised in this film. Unless, of course, you were the beneficiary of greased palms from those seemingly interested in anything but your health.

For me and my wife Lori, the issue certainly hit home. After weathering a severe health care storm in our own family, we cannot imagine the added burden of dealing with a bureaucratic nightmare hellbent on protecting precious profits. We are extremely fortunate that our health care system and the support of family, friends, and even strangers, enabled us to focus solely on getting our daughter well. Without that support system a completely unforeseen illness would have left us bankrupt in more ways than one.

Our journey through Maryn's illness brought us into contact with many families experiencing similar trauma. The stories that reached us from the U.S. left us very grateful our daughter's life was not left hanging by a thread while we waited for insurance approval. I'm pretty sure her treatment didn't come cheap. Which, of course, raises another issue...

As Canadians, we greatly value universal health care. We also recognize, however, that it is huge economic burden and one that is showing no signs of abating. There are no simple answers to resolving this issue, but we all should consider how to preserve those things worth fighting for.

The Pain Experience

Wow. Keeping up with a blog is much harder thean I could have ever imagined. It's becoming a painful experience itself. Time to revisit the overview of pain science and clinical application I wrote about a few weeks ago.

Today, we'll review number 1 of the Ten Steps to Understanding Manual and Movement Therapies for Pain. Much credit for this summary belongs to Luke Rickards, an Australian osteopath and researcher, and many of the other moderators at SomaSimple, a site dedicated to the application of scientific principles to the treatment of pain.

"1. Pain is a category of complex experiences, not a single sensation produced by a single stimulus."

Most people think of pain as a sensation - sensory input coming from a particular body part signalling that something is wrong. We are "hard-wired" to respond to danger signals in order to protect ourselves. That is why we have a pain system. However, pain is much more than sensory input being transmitted along a single pathway. Modern pain science describes pain more as an output generated by the brain, rather than an input from the body. It is always a bit hard to wrap your mind around something that seems to contradict your immediate experience. Then again, that is what science is for, right?

I think pain is most accurately understood as an experience, an experience comprised of sensation, but also the way one interprets and responds to that sensory information. It is easy to fall into the trap of linear or even circular thinking here, but understanding the importance of processing and behavior is essential to moving beyond pain. Understanding pain accurately helps reduce sensitivity and facilitates adaptive motor responses.

In Pain: The Science of Suffering, Patick Wall, asked the question: "What are the appropriate motor responses to the arrival of pain and injury signals?" In other words, "what movement do I need to do to feel better?" To me, this is, or ought to be, the central question of physiotherapy. Contrary to those who insist we treat biomechanics or function not pain, patients generally seek our care because they hurt and want to feel better. Understanding pain is the central issue for both therapist and patient. As we explore its meaning, we will begin to see how the right kind of movement can set us free.

How Do You Figure

"She looks that way because she was a dancer and did all kinds of ballet exercises."

Or maybe she was a good dancer because of her body type and what she did for exercise really did very little to change that. A long, lean body tends to be useful when performing, but if you're short and stalky, all the pilates, pole dancing, and gyrokinesis in the world is not going to change that. Sure, exercise is a means of altering your appearance, but not all appearances are reality.

In his article, Appearance Based Considerations found here, Dr. Doug McGuff states that "probably the most profound truth we can acknowledge about exercise is the fact that what we most desire from an exercise program is to improve our physical appearance." He goes on to say that "in contemporary society we have become obsessed with the aspects of beauty based on rarity and relatively unconcerned with those aspects based on health... The problem with the rarity aspect of beauty is that it is totally out of our control. Despite the implications that 'you too can look like this', these people have been bestowed a genetic gift that is very useful to them but can never be given to you. The fact that we fail to understand this truth is the driving force behind women's (and men's) fashion magazines, almost the entire exercise industry, food supplement industry, sporting goods industry and on and on."

Now, before you get discouraged, understand that there is lots you can do to improve both your health and appearance. There are three things that control your body shape - your skeleton, your muscles, and your body fat. Aside from improving bone density, exercise will not change the shape of your skeleton. It is a given, dictated by your genes. Although genetics also influences the amount of muscle you can develop, the way you distribute fat, and the order and rate at which fat can be lost, these tissues are more responsive to exercise and proper nutrition and determine your overall body shape. You may not look like a model, but you can become your personal best. Muscles can become stronger or weaker and fat can be gained or lost. You decide. Just don't be fooled.

Someone just asked me why I was displaying my religious beliefs on this blog. They had seen the link to The Year of Living Biblically and assumed I was proseletyzing on behalf of literal Biblical interpretation. In case you were worried, you can relax. I don't exactly make a great spokesman for such things, even if I were a proponent. AJ Jacobs, however, has written a very funny and enlightening book that demonstrates some of the absurdities of anachronistic hangovers that continue to "inform" our culture. The sheer number of extreme beliefs and believers he connects with on his journey are enough to give one deep pause about why everyone's so confused and conflict reigns supreme.